Barre de fruit et noix 35 g vs Envie de Nuts
Overall, Envie de Nuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Barre de fruit et noix 35 g | Envie de Nuts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 466 kcal | 502 kcal |
| Fat | 31.4 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 7.3 g |
| Sugars | 34.3 g | 27 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 8.9 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Barre de fruit et noix 35 g has 65% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 7.3 g).
- Envie de Nuts has 21% less sugar (27 g vs 34.3 g).
- Barre de fruit et noix 35 g has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Envie de Nuts has 11% more fiber (10 g vs 8.9 g).
- Envie de Nuts has 45% more protein (14 g vs 7.7 g).
- Only Barre de fruit et noix 35 g lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Barre de fruit et noix 35 g
dattes 52%, noix de pécan 28%, amandes 20%
Envie de Nuts
LU Créateur de biscuits depuis 1846 leil SUR LIT DE CHOCOLAT AU LAIT du plateau s départ ch pleil riantes en hiver GRANY envie de Nuts uts 125,00€ 85,00€ 83, B Fondus La Rando*** coucher de soleil Apéro** P'tit déj* lever de soleil 1 heure 1 demi-heure Dure SANS CONSERVATEUR NI COLORANT" RICHE EN FIBRES X3 BARRES AMANDES CACAHUÈTES & CRANBERRIES AMANDELEN PINDANOTEN & CRANBERRIES (2) (2) Canneberges coque / Noten (¹) Fruits à 1x
FAQ
Which is healthier: Barre de fruit et noix 35 g or Envie de Nuts?
Overall, Envie de Nuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Barre de fruit et noix 35 g has fewer calories: 466 kcal versus 502 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Envie de Nuts has less sugar: 27 g versus 34.3 g per 100 g.