Balsamic Vinegar drizzle vs Essig - Melfor
Overall, Essig - Melfor has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Balsamic Vinegar drizzle | Essig - Melfor |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 13 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 44.7 g | 5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Bisulfite de potassium |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Essig - Melfor has 93% fewer calories (13 kcal vs 180 kcal).
- Balsamic Vinegar drizzle has no fat, while Essig - Melfor has 0.6 g.
- Essig - Melfor has 89% less sugar (5 g vs 44.7 g).
- Only Essig - Melfor lists: Gluten, Bisulfite de potassium.
Ingredients
Balsamic Vinegar drizzle
aceto balsamico di modena pgi (61%) [wine vinegar (sulphites), cooked grape must (sulphites)], cooked grape must (sulphites). sugar, stabiliser (xanthan gum). allergy advice
Essig - Melfor
Branntweinessig, Wasser, Honig, Kräuterauszüge(¹), Malzkaramellaroma (Gerstenmalzextrakt), Antioxidationsmittel Kaliumhydrogensulfit. (1) gemäß VO (EU)1334/2008: Ohne Allergene um Ib zu v
FAQ
Which is healthier: Balsamic Vinegar drizzle or Essig - Melfor?
Overall, Essig - Melfor has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Essig - Melfor has fewer calories: 13 kcal versus 180 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Essig - Melfor has less sugar: 5 g versus 44.7 g per 100 g.