Baguette Constance vs Chlebíčková veka pšeničná
Overall, Chlebíčková veka pšeničná has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baguette Constance | Chlebíčková veka pšeničná |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 298 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 4.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | — |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Et produits à base de ces céréales | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Baguette Constance has 79% less fat (1 g vs 4.8 g).
- Chlebíčková veka pšeničná has 43% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Chlebíčková veka pšeničná is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Baguette Constance lists: Et produits à base de ces céréales.
Ingredients
Baguette Constance
Farine de blé HVE 55,5%, eau, levain de seigle, gluten de blé, sel, levure, farine d'orge malté, extrait de malt d'orge, levure désactivée, farine de blé malté.
Chlebíčková veka pšeničná
Pšeničná mouka (64 %), pitná voda, řepkový olej, droždí, jedlá sůl s jódem (jedlá sůl, jodičnan draselný), látka zlepšující mouku: kyselina L-askorbová, Může obsahovat stopy vajec, mléka, sóji, skořápkových plodů, sezamu a vlčího bobu.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baguette Constance or Chlebíčková veka pšeničná?
Overall, Chlebíčková veka pšeničná has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Baguette Constance has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chlebíčková veka pšeničná has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3 g per 100 g.