Comparison

Bac sorbet cassis - 1L vs Sorbet cassis

Overall, Sorbet cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBac sorbet cassis - 1LSorbet cassis
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 122 kcal 120 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 25 g 24.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 1.5 g 4.3 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives20
AllergensNuts, Amandes (Amygdalus communis L.), Et produits à base de ces noix (Macadamia ternifolia), Noisettes (Corylus avellana), Noix de pécan et produits à base de noix de pécan [Carya illinoiesis (Wangenh.) K. Koch], Pistaches (Pistacia vera)None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sorbet cassis has 65% more fiber (4.3 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Sorbet cassis has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Bac sorbet cassis - 1L lists: Nuts, Amandes (Amygdalus communis L.), Et produits à base de ces noix (Macadamia ternifolia), Noisettes (Corylus avellana), Noix de pécan et produits à base de noix de pécan [Carya illinoiesis (Wangenh.) K. Koch], Pistaches (Pistacia vera).

Ingredients

Bac sorbet cassis - 1L

Purée de cassis45% (origine France) ; ; eau ; ; sucre ; ; sirop de glucose ; ; arôme naturel de cassis ; ; stabilisants : gomme xanthane, gomme guar ; ; protéines de pois hydrolysées.

Sorbet cassis

Eau, purée de cassis variété noir de Bourgogne 25%, purée de cassis 25%, sucre, sirop de sucre inverti, dextrose, fibres végétales.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bac sorbet cassis - 1L or Sorbet cassis?

Overall, Sorbet cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sorbet cassis has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sorbet cassis has less sugar: 24.4 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons