Comparison

Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes vs Babas au rhum de la Réunion

Overall, Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBabas au rhum aux zestes d’a...Babas au rhum de la Réunion
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 227 kcal 317 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 9.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 6.2 g
Sugars 41.4 g 38.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.2 g 1.2 g
Protein 0.7 g 4.1 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, OrangeNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has 28% fewer calories (227 kcal vs 317 kcal).
  • Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has 91% less fat (0.9 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has 92% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Babas au rhum de la Réunion has 83% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Babas au rhum de la Réunion has 83% more protein (4.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Orange.

Ingredients

Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes

Eau, sucre, 7,5% baba (farine de blé, 3% œuf*, beurre (lait), sucre, levures, sel), 6,7% Rhum, extrait d'orange (écorce d'orange, alcool), 1,2% zeste d'orange, 1,2% zeste de citron.

Babas au rhum de la Réunion

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes or Babas au rhum de la Réunion?

Overall, Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Babas au rhum aux zestes d’agrumes has fewer calories: 227 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Babas au rhum de la Réunion has less sugar: 38.7 g versus 41.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons