Aqua to Go Still vs Eloa waters
Overall, Aqua to Go Still has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Aqua to Go Still | Eloa waters |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 14 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Aqua to Go Still has 93% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 14 kcal).
- Aqua to Go Still has no sugar, while Eloa waters has 3.1 g.
- Aqua to Go Still has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Aqua to Go Still
Natürliches Mineralwasser, ohne Kohlensäure aus der Quelle Werretaler, Quellort Löhne. Kühl, trocken, lichtgeschützt und abseits von geruchsbildenden Stoffen lagern. Nach dem Öffnen zum baldigen Verzehr bestimmt.
Eloa waters
Eau, Aloe Vera biologique, Sirop de SUcre de canne biologique, Acidifiant: acide citrique, arômes biologiques.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aqua to Go Still or Eloa waters?
Overall, Aqua to Go Still has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Aqua to Go Still has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 14 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Aqua to Go Still has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.