Apple spritzer lite vs Bio Apfelschorle
Overall, Apple spritzer lite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Apple spritzer lite | Bio Apfelschorle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 17 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apple spritzer lite has 39% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- Bio Apfelschorle has no fat, while Apple spritzer lite has 0.5 g.
- Apple spritzer lite has 44% less sugar (3.7 g vs 6.6 g).
- Apple spritzer lite has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Apple spritzer lite
Wasser, 35% Apfelsaft aus Apfel konzentrat, Kohlensäure, natürliches Apfelaroma. Bitte Flasche stehend, geruchsneutral, vor Wärme und Licht geschützt lagern. Nach Anbruch Inhalt innerhalb von 2-3 Tagen konsumieren.
Bio Apfelschorle
Bio-apfelsaft (66%), natürliches mineralwasser, kohlensäure
FAQ
Which is healthier: Apple spritzer lite or Bio Apfelschorle?
Overall, Apple spritzer lite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apple spritzer lite has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apple spritzer lite has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.