Comparison

Apfelschorle aus natürlichem Mineralwasser vs Apfelschorle

Overall, Apfelschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientApfelschorle aus natürlichem...Apfelschorle
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 25 kcal 16 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 5.8 g 3.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apfelschorle has 36% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 25 kcal).
  • Apfelschorle has no fat, while Apfelschorle aus natürlichem Mineralwasser has 0.5 g.
  • Apfelschorle has 36% less sugar (3.7 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Apfelschorle aus natürlichem Mineralwasser has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Apfelschorle aus natürlichem Mineralwasser

Natürliches Mineralwasser, Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaftkonzentrat (50%), Kohlensäure.

Apfelschorle

organic apple fruit juice drink made from directly pressed apple juice and apple juice concentrate, carbonated, fruit content: 35% ingredients: water, 20% apple juice, 15% apple juice from apple juice concentrate natural apple flavouring, antioxidant: ascorbic acid, carbon ccl/ho ri acid, from controlled organic farming, **without lid and label protect from heat and light, after opening, store refrigerated and upright and consume within 2-3 days, unopened best before: see imprint page,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Apfelschorle aus natürlichem Mineralwasser or Apfelschorle?

Overall, Apfelschorle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Apfelschorle has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 25 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Apfelschorle has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons