Comparison

Anti oxidante vs Jus pomme & fruits rouges

Overall, Anti oxidante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientAnti oxidanteJus pomme & fruits rouges
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — —
Calories 45 kcal 45 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 10.4 g 9.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 1.2 g
Protein 0.2 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Anti oxidante has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Anti oxidante lists: None.

Ingredients

Anti oxidante

frutas, plantasc durs ación como rutina be daration men h toxi Combinalo con una dietaariada ecuilbrada y un estilo de vida saludable, Zumo multhrutas con extracto de alcachofa, spinaca y ncentrado de spírulina y cártamo, ngedientes:2,7% zumo de manzana, 30% puré de pera, 15% zumo de uva blanca, 1% zumo de limon puré de jengibre, 0,2% extracto de alpachota) ppaca, 0,1% concentrado de spirulina yodnama Modo de preparación: Agitar antes de servir, Modo de cahservación: Este zumo debe conservarse siempre en él frigorífico entre los 0 °C y 6 °C, Una vez abilerto, conservar refrigerado en posición vertical infomación nutricional Valor energetico consumir en un plazo de 3-4 días, unsuo preferenterpente antes del:/ote ver parte superior 8/100 ml 191 kJ/

Jus pomme & fruits rouges

Pommes pressées, raisins blanc pressés, fraises mixées, cassis pressés

FAQ

Which is healthier: Anti oxidante or Jus pomme & fruits rouges?

Overall, Anti oxidante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Anti oxidante has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Jus pomme & fruits rouges has less sugar: 9.6 g versus 10.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons