Amita motion vs Piña, uva y manzana
Overall, Amita motion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Amita motion | Piña, uva y manzana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.4 g | 11.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Apple, Kiwi, Orange, Peach | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amita motion has 65% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
- Only Amita motion lists: Apple, Kiwi, Orange, Peach.
- Only Piña, uva y manzana lists: None.
Ingredients
Amita motion
Juices from concentrates (apple, peach, orange, grape, pineapple and grapefruit), purees (kiwi, passion fruit and mango), vitamins (C, B6, B12, biotin, E, niacin and folic acid).
Piña, uva y manzana
Zumo de piña a partir de concentrado (55%), zumo de manzana a partir de concentrado (30%), zumo de uva a partir de concentrado (15%) y vitamina C.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amita motion or Piña, uva y manzana?
Overall, Amita motion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amita motion has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amita motion has less sugar: 10.4 g versus 11.2 g per 100 g.