Comparison

Amandinas chocolat au lait vs Etui 40g anis bio

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAmandinas chocolat au laitEtui 40g anis bio
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 559 kcal 398 kcal
Fat 38 g 0 g
Saturated fat 15 g 0 g
Sugars 37 g 97 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 2.7 g 0 g
Protein 11.9 g 0 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, NutsNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Etui 40g anis bio has 29% fewer calories (398 kcal vs 559 kcal).
  • Etui 40g anis bio has no fat, while Amandinas chocolat au lait has 38 g.
  • Etui 40g anis bio has no saturated fat, while Amandinas chocolat au lait has 15 g.
  • Amandinas chocolat au lait has 62% less sugar (37 g vs 97 g).
  • Amandinas chocolat au lait has 100% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Amandinas chocolat au lait has 100% more protein (11.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Amandinas chocolat au lait lists: Milk, Nuts.
  • Only Etui 40g anis bio lists: None.

Ingredients

Amandinas chocolat au lait

sucre, amandes torréfiées (28% beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, poudre de lait entier, cacao maigre en poudre (3%), poudre de lait écrémé, matière grasse de lait anhydre, émulsifiant : lécithine, arôme. Cacao : 35% minimum dans le chocolat. Peut contenir des traces de gluten et d'autres fruits à coque A conserver à l'abri de la chaleur (18 à 20 degrés).

Etui 40g anis bio

Sucre, arôme naturel d'anis étoilé, graine d'anis vert (0,2%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Amandinas chocolat au lait or Etui 40g anis bio?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Etui 40g anis bio has fewer calories: 398 kcal versus 559 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Amandinas chocolat au lait has less sugar: 37 g versus 97 g per 100 g.

More comparisons