Amandes en poudre vs Amandes en poudre
Overall, Amandes en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes en poudre | Amandes en poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 637 kcal | 639 kcal |
| Fat | 55 g | 53 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.2 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.1 g | 9.2 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 28 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amandes en poudre has 11% less sugar (4 g vs 4.5 g).
- Amandes en poudre has 11% more protein (28 g vs 25 g).
- Amandes en poudre is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Amandes en poudre lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Amandes en poudre
Peut contenir des traces d'arachides, autres fruits à coque, soja, graines de sésame, céréales contenant du gluten, lait et sulfites.
Amandes en poudre
Amandes en poudre. Traces d'arachides, lait, oeufs et autres fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes en poudre or Amandes en poudre?
Overall, Amandes en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes en poudre has fewer calories: 637 kcal versus 639 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amandes en poudre has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.