Alter Schweizer vs Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois
Overall, Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alter Schweizer | Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 432 kcal | 399 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has 14% less fat (31 g vs 36 g).
- Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has no sugar, while Alter Schweizer has 0.5 g.
- Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has 67% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Alter Schweizer
Rohmilch vollfett Lait cru gras Latte crudo grasso
Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois
Fromage gras à pâte dure au lait cru
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alter Schweizer or Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois?
Overall, Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has fewer calories: 399 kcal versus 432 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kaltbach Emmentaler 12 mois has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.