Alpensalz vs So-Low 50% Less Sodium
Overall, Alpensalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alpensalz | So-Low 50% Less Sodium |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 48 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 47.3 g |
| Fiber | 17 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- So-Low 50% Less Sodium has no calories, while Alpensalz has 48 kcal.
- So-Low 50% Less Sodium has no sugar, while Alpensalz has 10 g.
- Alpensalz has 100% less salt (0 g vs 47.3 g).
- Alpensalz has 100% more fiber (17 g vs 0 g).
- Alpensalz has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Alpensalz
Siedesalz, Trennmittel Natriumferrocyanid.
So-Low 50% Less Sodium
Potassium Chloride (51%), Salt (48%), Anti-caking Agents (Magnesium Carbonate, Potassium Hexacyanoferrate II, Sodium Hexacyanoferrate II).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alpensalz or So-Low 50% Less Sodium?
Overall, Alpensalz has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
So-Low 50% Less Sodium has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 48 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
So-Low 50% Less Sodium has less sugar: 0 g versus 10 g per 100 g.