Comparison
Agurk vs Concombre bio
Overall, Agurk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Agurk | Concombre bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 15 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Agurk has 35% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 15 kcal).
- Agurk has 27% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Agurk
Agurk (100%)
Concombre bio
Concombre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Agurk or Concombre bio?
Overall, Agurk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Agurk has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 15 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Agurk has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.