Actimel bianco 156808 vs Actimel Natural
Overall, Actimel bianco 156808 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Actimel bianco 156808
Actimel Natural
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Actimel bianco 156808 | Actimel Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 70 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 10.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Actimel bianco 156808 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Actimel bianco 156808 lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Actimel bianco 156808
Latte scremato, crema di latte, zucchero liquido, destrosio, sali minerali del latte, L.casei, S.thermophilus, L.bulgaricus, vitamine B6 e D. Senza glutine.
Actimel Natural
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Actimel bianco 156808 or Actimel Natural?
Overall, Actimel bianco 156808 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Actimel bianco 156808 has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Actimel Natural has less sugar: 10.8 g versus 11 g per 100 g.