Comparison

Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP vs Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena

Overall, Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAceto Balsamico di Modena IG...Crema Aceto Balsamico di Mod...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 122 kcal 195 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 25 g 41 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 1.1 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.9 g
Additives02
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has 37% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 195 kcal).
  • Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena has no fat, while Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has 0.5 g.
  • Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has 39% less sugar (25 g vs 41 g).
  • Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP

Vinaigre de vin bio*, moût de raisin cuit bio*. *Contient _sulfites_.

Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena

gekochter Traubenmost, Aceto Balsamico Modena IGP 38% (Weinessig, konzentrierter Traubenmost, gekochter Traubenmost, Farbstoff: E 150d), Feinessig Farbstoff: E 150d, modifizierte Maisstärke, Verdickungsmittel: Xanthan.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP or Crema Aceto Balsamico di Modena?

Overall, Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 195 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP has less sugar: 25 g versus 41 g per 100 g.

More comparisons