Comparison
Acelga trozos bajo en sal vs Acelgas
Overall, Acelga trozos bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Acelga trozos bajo en sal | Acelgas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 12 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Ausencia | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Acelga trozos bajo en sal has 68% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Acelga trozos bajo en sal has 62% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Acelga trozos bajo en sal lists: Ausencia.
Ingredients
Acelga trozos bajo en sal
Acelgas, agua y antoxidante (ácido ascórbico).
Acelgas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Acelga trozos bajo en sal or Acelgas?
Overall, Acelga trozos bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Acelga trozos bajo en sal has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Acelga trozos bajo en sal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.