Comparison

Abtal vs Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten

Overall, Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAbtalBebida de zumo de naranja si...
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 49 kcal 20 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 11.2 g 4.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives56
AllergensOrangeNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has 59% fewer calories (20 kcal vs 49 kcal).
  • Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has 57% less sugar (4.8 g vs 11.2 g).
  • Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Abtal lists: Orange.

Ingredients

Abtal

EAU, SUCRE, CONCENTRÉ DE JUS DE FRUIT: CLÉMENTINE, ORANGE, ANANAS, POMME, FRUIT DE LA PASSION, PULPE DE LA GUAVE, EPAISSISSANT: E440, E466,ACIDE CITRIQUE E330, ARÔME, BÉTA CAROTÈNE : 160A, VITAMINES A,D,E,C.

Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten

Agua, zumo de frutas parcialmente a partir de concentrado 10% (naranja, mandarina, manzana, uva), azúcar, acidulante (E330), aceite vegetal (coco), corrector de la acidez (E331), emulgente (E1450), espesantes (E415, E466), aromas, edulcorante (sucralosa), colorante (E160a), vitaminas (C, E, B6),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Abtal or Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten?

Overall, Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has fewer calories: 20 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bebida de zumo de naranja sin gas sin gluten has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 11.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons