6111259345782 vs Ferrero rocher t16
Overall, Ferrero rocher t16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 6111259345782 | Ferrero rocher t16 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 564 kcal | 603 kcal |
| Fat | 37.4 g | 43 g |
| Saturated fat | 18.2 g | 14.1 g |
| Sugars | 20.5 g | 39.9 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 4 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 6111259345782 has 13% less fat (37.4 g vs 43 g).
- Ferrero rocher t16 has 23% less saturated fat (14.1 g vs 18.2 g).
- 6111259345782 has 49% less sugar (20.5 g vs 39.9 g).
- Ferrero rocher t16 has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Ferrero rocher t16 has 60% more protein (8.2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Only Ferrero rocher t16 lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
6111259345782
Not available.
Ferrero rocher t16
Chocolat au lait 30 %, (sucre, beurre de cacao, pâte de cacao, lait écrémé en poudre, matière grasse laitière anhydre, émulsifiant: lécithine de soja, vanilline), noisettes (28,5%), sucre, graisse végétale, farine de froment, lactosérum en poudre, cacao maigre, émulsifiant: lécithine de soja, poudre à lever: carbonate acide de sodium), sel, arôme (vanilline).
FAQ
Which is healthier: 6111259345782 or Ferrero rocher t16?
Overall, Ferrero rocher t16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
6111259345782 has fewer calories: 564 kcal versus 603 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
6111259345782 has less sugar: 20.5 g versus 39.9 g per 100 g.