4010142055659 vs Salchi Frank Fort
Overall, Salchi Frank Fort has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4010142055659 | Salchi Frank Fort |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 11.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 6 | 4 |
| Allergens | Beef, Celery, Chicken, Milk, Pork | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salchi Frank Fort has 19% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 209 kcal).
- Salchi Frank Fort has 31% less fat (11.8 g vs 17 g).
- Salchi Frank Fort has 34% less saturated fat (4 g vs 6.1 g).
- Salchi Frank Fort has no sugar, while 4010142055659 has 0.5 g.
- 4010142055659 has 28% less salt (2 g vs 2.8 g).
- 4010142055659 has 31% more protein (13 g vs 9 g).
- Only 4010142055659 lists: Beef, Celery, Chicken, Milk, Pork.
- Only Salchi Frank Fort lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
4010142055659
40% poultry mechanically separated meat (turkey, chicken), 33% meat (pork, turkey, chicken, beef), water, poultry fat with skin (turkey, chicken), iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), spice and spice extracts (contains celery), sugar, stabilisers (E451, E450, E331iii), milk protein, antioxidant (E300), preservative (E250), beechwood smoked.
Salchi Frank Fort
Carne de pavo, agua, almidón modificado de maiz, sal común, proteina de soya, fosfato de sodio, saborizante artificial, conservador (acetato de sodio), carragenina, eritorbato de sodio, humo, nitrito de sodio y colorante artificial (rojo no. 40).
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4010142055659 or Salchi Frank Fort?
Overall, Salchi Frank Fort has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salchi Frank Fort has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salchi Frank Fort has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.