Comparison

4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie à la Diable vs Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne

Overall, Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie...Palette à la diable à l'Alsa...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 157 kcal 126 kcal
Fat 7.5 g 6.7 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 2.6 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.7 g 2 g
Protein 21 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensMustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has 20% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 157 kcal).
  • Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has 11% less fat (6.7 g vs 7.5 g).
  • 4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie à la Diable has 19% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has 26% less salt (2 g vs 2.7 g).
  • 4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie à la Diable has 33% more protein (21 g vs 14 g).
  • Only 4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie à la Diable lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie à la Diable

Épaule de porc, moutarde (eau, graines de MOUTARDE, vinaigre d'alcool, sel), crépine de porc, sel, caramel (sucre, eau), bouillon (blette, acérola, carotte), dextrose, ferments.

Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 4 Tranches de Palette Rôtie à la Diable or Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne?

Overall, Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Palette à la diable à l'Alsacienne has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons