Comparison

33Cl Can Slim Tropical vs Bio Granatapfel Fruchtsaft

Overall, 33Cl Can Slim Tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient33Cl Can Slim TropicalBio Granatapfel Fruchtsaft
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 25 kcal 56 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 6 g 13 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives40
AllergensOrangeNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 33Cl Can Slim Tropical has 55% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 56 kcal).
  • 33Cl Can Slim Tropical has 54% less sugar (6 g vs 13 g).
  • Only 33Cl Can Slim Tropical lists: Orange.

Ingredients

33Cl Can Slim Tropical

eau de source 80%, jus de fruits à base de concentrés 12% (orange 6,5%, pomme, fruit de la passion 0,1%, mangue 0,08%), sucre, sirop de fructose, acidifiant (acide citrique, acide malique), arôme naturel, antioxydant (acide ascorbique), colorant (extrait de paprika), arôme naturel d'orange.

Bio Granatapfel Fruchtsaft

Bio Granatapfelsaft. Ingrédients: jus de grenade bio. Ingredienti: succo di melagrana bio. Nährwerte Valeurs nutritives moyennes Valori nutritivi medi 100m B 1.56 kcal

FAQ

Which is healthier: 33Cl Can Slim Tropical or Bio Granatapfel Fruchtsaft?

Overall, 33Cl Can Slim Tropical has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

33Cl Can Slim Tropical has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 56 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

33Cl Can Slim Tropical has less sugar: 6 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons