Comparison

31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE vs Coca-Cola Zero

Overall, 31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO...Coca-Cola Zero
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 0 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Ingredients

31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE

500mle EXT Bevat en bran van fenylalanine Baisa atachianata phenylalanine Erischungsartink mit Macmestam cane, acuanecer de sp AGABEN PER/ POUR/JE I wuran sake ichen Erwachsenen ages Tm mieste houdbaar tot ze hals see Flaschentals Verchins CMVCC B.278-156156 1:26 182 182 Roccale S L:cocacola 8088 I'm a bottle made from 100% recyc

Coca-Cola Zero

Wasser, Kohlensäure, Farbstoff E 150d, Süssungsmittel Cyclamat, Acesulfam-K und Aspartam, Säuerungsmittel E 338 und Natriumcitrate, natürliche Aromen inkl. Koffein.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE or Coca-Cola Zero?

Overall, 31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 0 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

31 03 26 Coca-Cola COLD ZERO SUGAR NO CALORIES ICE has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons