Comparison

20260417 vs Nature sucré

Overall, Nature sucré has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient20260417Nature sucré
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group — —
Calories 85 kcal 62 kcal
Fat 3.2 g 1 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 10.8 g 9.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 3 g 3.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nature sucré has 27% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 85 kcal).
  • Nature sucré has 69% less fat (1 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Nature sucré has 67% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Nature sucré has 10% less sugar (9.7 g vs 10.8 g).
  • Nature sucré has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
  • Nature sucré has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only 20260417 lists: Milk.

Ingredients

20260417

envia COU UN GINE CNVIA YAOURT Nature Sucré au Sucre de Canne 16 POTS Source de Catelum et de

Nature sucré

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 20260417 or Nature sucré?

Overall, Nature sucré has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nature sucré has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nature sucré has less sugar: 9.7 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons