20260417 vs Nature sucré
Overall, Nature sucré has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 20260417 | Nature sucré |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 10.8 g | 9.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nature sucré has 27% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Nature sucré has 69% less fat (1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Nature sucré has 67% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Nature sucré has 10% less sugar (9.7 g vs 10.8 g).
- Nature sucré has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
- Nature sucré has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only 20260417 lists: Milk.
Ingredients
20260417
envia COU UN GINE CNVIA YAOURT Nature Sucré au Sucre de Canne 16 POTS Source de Catelum et de
Nature sucré
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 20260417 or Nature sucré?
Overall, Nature sucré has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nature sucré has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nature sucré has less sugar: 9.7 g versus 10.8 g per 100 g.