Comparison

1848 vs LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g

Overall, LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient1848LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait N...
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 559 kcal 560 kcal
Fat 36 g 35.3 g
Saturated fat 15 g 12.9 g
Sugars 49 g 48.1 g
Salt — 0.1 g
Fiber 4.6 g 4.4 g
Protein 5.2 g 7.3 g
Additives31
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g has 14% less saturated fat (12.9 g vs 15 g).
  • LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g has 29% more protein (7.3 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Only 1848 lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

1848

Sucre, praliné 28 % (noisettes, sucre), pâte de cacao, graisses végétales (palme, karité), éclats de noisettes caramélisés 6,5% (noisettes, sucre), beurre de cacao, beurre concentré, lactosérum en poudre (de lait), poudre de lait écrémé, émulsifiants (lécithines de soja, E476), arômes. Peut contenir autres fruits à coque. A 7 Energie 2328 kJ/

LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g

Sucre, NOISETTES, pâte de cacao*, beurre de cacao*, AMANDES, LAIT entier en poudre, BEURRE pâtissier, LAIT écrémé en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithines), arômes naturels de vanille. 23% d'amandes et de noisettes. *Bilan massique certifié Rainforest Alliance www.ra.org/fr. Peut contenir : OEUFS, GLUTEN, AUTRES FRUITS A COQUE.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 1848 or LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g?

Overall, LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

1848 has fewer calories: 559 kcal versus 560 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

LANVIN l'Escargot Duo Lait Noir 362g has less sugar: 48.1 g versus 49 g per 100 g.

More comparisons