Comparison

1664 33 cl 1664 blanc 5.0 degre alcool vs Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL

Overall, Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient1664 33 cl 1664 blanc 5.0 de...Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBO...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 45 kcal 35 kcal
Fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.4 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesGluten, Gs1:T4078:AX

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL has 22% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 45 kcal).
  • Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL has 97% less sugar (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Only 1664 33 cl 1664 blanc 5.0 degre alcool lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL lists: Gs1:T4078:AX.

Ingredients

1664 33 cl 1664 blanc 5.0 degre alcool

Eau, MALT D'ORGE, BLE, sirop de glucose, caramel aromatique, arôme, extrait de houblon, stabilisant : gomme d'acacia, ecorce d'orange douce, coriandre, SULFITES

Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL

Eau, MALT D'ORGE, BLÉ, sirop de glucose, ORGE, MALT DE BLÉ, extrait de houblon

FAQ

Which is healthier: 1664 33 cl 1664 blanc 5.0 degre alcool or Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL?

Overall, Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kronenbourg 10X25CL KRONENBOURG 4.2 DEGRE ALCOOL has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons